ANWR filibuster succeeds; now, we need a few more senators

We had two votes today that illustrate what an enormous difference the degree of minority status makes - even aside from the question of maintaining at least 41 votes.

The Senate passed the awful budget reconciliation that provides cash for upcoming tax cuts for the wealthy on the backs of the elderly, poor, and students.  They did this through a 51-50 vote, with Cheney providing the tiebreaker.  A single additional Democrat could have killed this.

Then, on a much happier note, they failed (just minutes ago) 56-44 to invoke cloture on the defense approrpations bill including the ANWR drilling provision - meaning the filibuster stands.  FOUR Democrats voted for cloture: Akaka, Inouye, Landrieu, and Nelson; TWO Republicans voted against: Chafee and DeWine; Frist voted against for strictly procedural reasons.  So, consider how precarious this actually was.  Technically, we didn't require the Republican votes, as we had 40 Democrats plus one Independent.  But being able to muster only 41 minority party votes for this filibuster is too close for comfort.

The talking heads will blather on about how difficult it would be for us to win the Senate in '06.  They're right in a sense - it will be difficult to pick up 6 seats (although hardly impossible).  However, I like to remind myself at every opportunity what a difference a 2 or 3 seat pickup could make.  Today's events drive the point home yet again.

Update [2005-12-21 13:5:36 by arenwin]: I should note that "moderate environmentalist" McCain complained about the move by Ted Stevens to attach ANWR drilling to the defense appropriations bill - and then went right ahead and voted to end the filibuster.  Which, of course, would have virtually guaranteed passage of ANWR drilling into law.  Once again, why is he a hero of some on the left?



Display:


Landrieu (none / 0)

By the way, Landrieu has my sympathies, and I don't hold this vote against her.  It would have been impossible for a Louisiana senator to vote in such a way as to potentially delay storm recovery aid, which was also tucked away into this bill.

That's what's so diabolical about Stevens' approach; he didn't just hold military spending hostage, he also held Katrina relief hostage.

by arenwin on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 01:02:07 PM EST

Hawaii (none / 0)

both of the senators from Hawaii voted for the bill because they have some sort of deal with the senators from Alaska that they vote together on things concerning their states.
by sam89 on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 05:06:33 PM EST

Re: Hawaii (3.00 / 1)

It's your basic quid pro quo: Stevens has promised to shepherd through Akaka's Native Hawaiian Federal Recognition Bill -- giving Native Hawaiians not quite tribal status, as I understand it, but something analogous -- in exchange for Inouye and Akaka's votes on ANWR. Considering how little progress has been made on getting Akaka's bill passed in the last five years, you gotta wonder if Inouye and Akaka are going to suspect soon if they're getting played.
by Crazy Vaclav on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 05:54:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hawaii (none / 0)

I'd be surprised if there was much progress; it sounds like Akaka is moving against quite a headwind.  I would have expected considerable controversy even within the Native Hawaiian community about whether tribe-like status is a good thing.  You could make a strong argument that the tribal recognition system has been a disaster, disempowering Native Americans at least as much as it has empowered them, if not more.

And then there's the usual Federal reluctance to recognize any further tribal groups - although it's not clear to me from a quick skim of this bill just how much similarity there is to the tribal recognition process (would the Native Hawaiian government be a separate sovereign?  Are new trustee relationships created?)

In any case, thanks for the info.  I was perplexed; now I understand what happened with those two votes.

by arenwin on Thu Dec 22, 2005 at 12:23:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I hope when Akaka or Inouye (none / 0)

of HI retire Ed Case runs. He voted no to ANWR drilling.
Running the Davis, Nelson Klein team in Florida.
by Liberal on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 05:37:40 PM EST

the McCain comment (none / 0)

thank you for bringing up his vote...and i myself have that same question whenever people praise him..
nice diary.
by jeremythensaid on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 08:09:17 PM EST

Re: the McCain comment (none / 0)

I've come to believe that it needs to be commented on at every available opportunity.  I still hold to my opinion that there's no crisis at this time regarding the media myth of "McCain the moderate."  But since I wrote that, I have to admit that further conversations with progressives have convinced me that we have a greater distance to go than I hoped in making the point that this guy is pretty hard right.

Fortunately, his record will help make the case for us.

by arenwin on Thu Dec 22, 2005 at 12:27:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Needed six Rs, got 5 (none / 0)

This time the moderate who voted for the bill was Arlen Spector.  Somehow, though, it always seems to run short.  Get Smith, lose Specter.  Or Chafee.  Or the Maine ladies.  Is this a shell game to make the Rs in blue states look more moderate than they are?

Pick up two seats (say Chafee and Santorum) and we may not pick up 2 votes but we pick up 1 and a little surety on the second.

by David Kowalski on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 11:01:10 PM EST

Re: Needed six Rs, got 5 (none / 0)

Agreed.  Even Chafee is vulnerable to pressure, and ultimately unreliable.  I suspect there is an element of a shell game.  I imagine a sort of unofficial agreement: OK, you solid-blue-state Republicans, we won't punish you for voting against your party, so long as you come through for us most of the time, when we really really want you to (e.g., Patriot Act filibuster, not supported by a single "moderate.")

And the truth is, if you look at the individual record of any one of them, there's no Zell Miller in the bunch - no one who consistently, emphatically defies the leadership.

The moderates don't dare pull a Zell Miller on the Republican party.  Look how they dragged Specter through the coals; and he's always been a tow-the-line kind of fellow when it comes down to the really important votes.

I actually like Lincoln Chafee.  I almost wish we were in a political environment where we could lay off on Republicans who seem like they have a conscience.  I'd take him into the Democratic party with open arms.  But with the kind of leadership and policies Chafee is facilitating, he's got to go down.

by arenwin on Thu Dec 22, 2005 at 12:03:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I just wanted to say... (none / 0)

a big fat Kudos to "outing" metonym.  Good work.

n

Invest in nature
by NCDem on Wed Jan 04, 2006 at 03:59:40 PM EST

Re: I just wanted to say... (none / 0)

Well, you weren't around, so someone had to be enough of a hardass to do it.  ;)

If this dude was a garden variety troll, it wouldn't have been worth the effort, and probably just would have been as "vindictive" as he claimed.  But amusing as his late summer romp through MyDD was, if we could eat wasted bandwidth, he would have fed a small nation.

Now, how long till he comes back under another yet user name, a little more cautious this time?  But, Yea! by his arrogant and yet vacuous prose and bizarre narcissism we shall know him... LOL.

Happy new year, BTW.  

by arenwin on Wed Jan 04, 2006 at 04:41:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.